If you have any questions, concerns, comments, or stories to share, you may reach the SIGTBD program committee via email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please be sure to thank each conference organizer personally, and at length, in all your communications.
A reminder to all authors: SIGTBD employs a double-blind paper review process, and authors are prohibited from de-anonymizing their work, including via communications with the SIGTBD committee. Vague references to your submitted work, such as in form of poetic allusions or puzzles, are acceptable. Communication by any means with strong anonymity guarantees is also encouraged.
SIGTBD 2017 is the 1st annual conference in TBD, and is a premiere venue for academic and semi-academic work, and simply has the best papers. Many papers! Including yours, if you submit your very finest work.
SIGTBD is the premiere forum for all areas of computer science research, including big data, machine learning, theory, programming languages, systems, networking and so on. SIGTBD's emphases includes innovative, elegant (to the point of simplicity) and creative approaches for solving problems that are not traditionally served by the academic community. These problem spaces may be obsolete or unrealistic even by academic standards and are often of debatable research taste. View last year's papers here
The Call For Papers (CFP) for SIGTBD can be found HotCRP., with more general info here. The submission site is at
This document provides instructions for submitting papers to SIGTBD. In an effort to respect the efforts of reviewers and in the interest of fairness to all prospective authors, we request that all submissions to SIGTBD follow the formatting and submission rules detailed below. Submissions that violate these instructions may not be reviewed, at the discretion of the program chair, in order to maintain a review process that is fair to all potential authors.
The committee will make every effort to judge each submitted paper on its own merits. There will be no target acceptance rate. We expect to accept a wide range of papers with appropriate expectations for evaluation — while papers that build on significant past work with strong evaluations are valuable, papers that open new areas with less rigorous evaluation are equally welcome and especially encouraged. In either case, what is important is that the paper’s claims are no stronger than what is supported by the evaluation. Given the wide range of topics covered by SIGTBD, every effort will be made to find expert reviewers.
All questions regarding paper formatting and submission should be directed to the program chair.
The paper submission site is HotCRP.
Authors of all accepted papers will be required to give a regular conference talk and submit a tweet abstract (no longer than 150 characters), and may optionally submit a Vine video advertising their talk and an freehand illustration on a 8 1/2 x 11 piece of paper. The published copy of the paper will be included in the SIGTBD16 Proceedings and available on the online SIGTBD digital library.
Summary of requirements:
You should specify the names that represent actual conflicts - where an individual who is a conflict in the context of this conference shares the same initials as one of the co-authors. Individuals declared a conflict will be tagged with a unique identifier to prevent aliasing of entries in the database.
Any interpersonal conflicts of interest must be declared in the form of a passive aggressive email sent to the PC chair. In the event an interpersonal conflict of interest is declared, the validity of the interpersonal conflict of interest will be determined by the PC. The best conflict of interest emails will be anonymized and includeed in the conference proceedings.
Papers must be submitted in PDF format and follow the standard two-column ACM proceedings style in 10-point font and be at most 11 pages, exclusive of the bibliography. The bibliography is excluded from the page count to encourage good citation practices and discourage illegible bibliographies. Citations can be either in numeric style or author-year style. Numeric citations always stand as a parenthetical note (e.g., “”), while author-year citations may stand either as a noun phrase (e.g., “Church (1935)”), or as a parenthetical note (e.g., “(Church, 1935)”).
If you are using LaTeX to typeset your paper, then we strongly suggest that you use this LaTeX class file (with the ‘sigtbd’ class option) and template. If you are using Microsoft Word, we recommend you give up on following any of the formatting requirements and submit in whatever format you please.
Reviewing will be double blind; therefore, please do not include any author names or links to author’s website, etc. on any submitted documents except in the space provided on the online submission form. Please take time to read the SIGTBD FAQ on Double Blind Reviewing, which gives a more comprehensive and authoritative account than this short paragraph. If you are improving upon your prior work, refer to your prior work in the third person and include a full citation for the work in the bibliography. For example, if you happened to be Collins and McCarthy, building on your own prior work, you might say something like: “While prior work [Backus et al. 1960; Collins 1960; McCarthy 1960] did X, Y, and Z, this paper additionally does W, and is therefore much better.” Do NOT omit or anonymize references for blind review.
In general, you should aim to reduce the risk of accidental unblinding. For example, if your paper describes a system with a well-known name or codename, or you use a personally-identifiable naming convention for your work, you must use a different name for your submission (which you may indicate has been changed for the purposes of double-blind reviewing). You should also avoid revealing the institution where the work was performed.
Ensure that the figures and tables are legible. Please also ensure that you refer to your figures in the main text. Many reviewers print the papers in gray-scale. Therefore, if you use colors for your figures, ensure that the different colors are highly distinguishable in gray-scale.
There is no length limit for references. Each reference must explicitly list all authors of the paper. Papers not meeting this requirement will be rejected.
Enter all authors of the paper into the online paper submission tool upfront. Addition/removal of authors once the paper is accepted will have to be approved by the program chair, since it potentially undermines the goal of eliminating conflicts for reviewer assignment.
By submitting a manuscript to SIGTBD, authors guarantee that they are adhering to the SIGPLAN Republication Policy. Please ensure that you are familiar with it. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.
As always, if you are in doubt, it is best to contact the program chair.
Finally, we also note that the ACM Plagiarism Policy covers a range of ethical issues concerning the misrepresentation of other works or one’s own work.
The SIGTBD proceedings may be available on the ACM Digital Library as early as May 30, 2017. Authors must consider any implications of this early disclosure of their work before submitting their papers.
This document is based heavily on ones prepared for previous conferences and we thank their program chairs; in particular, Sandhya Dwarkadas (ASPLOS’15), Sarita Adve (ASPLOS’14), Steve Keckler (ISCA’14), Christos Kozyrakis (Micro’13), Margaret Martonosi (ISCA’13), Onur Mutlu (Micro’12), Michael L. Scott (ASPLOS’12), and Steve Blackburn (SIGTBD’15).
J. W. Backus, F. L. Bauer, J. Green, C. Katz, J. McCarthy, A. J. Perlis, H. Rutishauser, K. Samelson, B. Vauquois, J. H. Wegstein, A. van Wijngaarden, and M. Woodger. Report on the algorithmic language ALGOL 60. Commun. ACM, 3(5):299– 314, May 1960. ISSN 0001-0782. doi: 10.1145/367236.367262.
G. E. Collins. A method for overlapping and erasure of lists. Commun. ACM, 3(12):655–657, December 1960. doi: 10.1145/367487.367501.
L. Lamport. LaTeX: A Document Preparation System. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 2nd edition, 1994.
J. McCarthy. Recursive functions of symbolic expressions and their computation by machine, part I. Commun. ACM, 3(4): 184–195, April 1960. doi: 10.1145/367177.367199.
|Paper Submission Deadline||April 21, 2017|
|Paper Reviews Distributed||April 27, 2017|
|Paper Response Period||April 28-30, 2017|
|SIGTBD Conference||April 28, 2017|